A little secret to rock your YouTube subscribers
Get Free YouTube Subscribers, Views and Likes

Splash Mountain: Why Tiana's Almost There (and why that's okay) | STATE OF THE PARKS

Follow
Tony Goldmark

Some Jerk With A Camera brings back State Of The Parks with a lengthy editorial video essay on the history and future of Disney's iconic flume ride Splash Mountain, as well as the movie it's based on, 1946's Song of the South, and why everybody needs to please calm down about the recentlyannounced retheme based on The Princess and the Frog.

0:00 Opening disclaimers
1:30 What did I miss?
2:39 Disney World reopened during a pandemic?!?
5:17 Splash Mountain is being rethemed
10:07 You're not gonna #SaveSplashMountain.
13:23 Joel Chandler Harris and Uncle Remus
14:50 ZipADeeDooDah
16:55 Song of the South is bad and also racist
21:21 Should Disney erase their racist history?
23:57 The Bear Country problem
24:52 The no flume ride problem
26:34 The America Sings problem
29:03 How Splash Mountain got its name
31:03 Song of the South's final rerelease
32:23 Splash Mountain opens in 1989
35:13 Hey, it's still open in Tokyo!
36:16 The Princess and the Frog
37:42 Jurassic Park: The Ride
38:20 Why Tiana is a better fit anyway
41:46 Why Disney announced this in 2020
44:35 Credits

Patreon:   / tonygoldmark  
Twitter:   / tonygoldmark  

My podcast, Escape From Vault Disney, is BACK with new weekly episodes! Download it for free at any of the following links:
iTunes/Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/listen?...
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6v6o0ub...
Pipedream Podcasts: https://www.pipedreampodcasts.com/esc...
RSS feed: http://escapefromvaultdisney.libsyn.com/
Pledge to my Patreon to get each new episode one day early!   / tonygoldmark  
And don't forget to rate the show and leave a review!

DISCLAIMER: This video, like every video on this channel, is intended only for mature audiences. While the topic at hand is a form of media commonly associated with small children, the purpose of this video is to present a mixture of analysis and comedy about said media from a distinctly adult perspective, which may possibly include profane language and references to sex, drugs and/or violence. YouTube, like many websites, collects personal data on its users. The Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) has made it illegal to collect personal data on children younger than 13, and rather than fix their own algorithm, YouTube is essentially threatening to pass the blame onto content creators whose work may seem "attractive" to children. For these reasons, the producers of this video feel compelled to state, in no uncertain terms, that if you allow a child under 13 years old to watch this YouTube channel, you are a bad parent or guardian.

posted by juliadictoj8