Newcomb’s Paradox has confounded philosophers, mathematicians, and game players for over 50 years. The problem is simple: You can take Box A, which contains $1,000, and Box B, which contains either $0 or $1,000,000, or you can just take Box B. The right choice seems obvious but there’s a catch.

Before you play, an omniscient being has predicted whether you’d take both Box A and Box B or only Box B. If he’s predicted that you’ll take both, he’s put $0 in Box B. If he predicts that you’ll only take Box B, he’s put $1,000,000 inside. So… what do you do?

I explore the two approaches to this problem, one based on the math of expected utility and the other based on a logical dominance principle. Newcomb’s Paradox raises questions about free will and determinism as it explores whether a problem with no solution might be easier than a problem with two perfectly valid contradictory solutions.

** SOURCES **

“Newcomb's Problem And Two Principles Of Choice,” by Robert Nozick
http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/rjohns/noz...

Newcomb’s Paradox poll results from The Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/a...

** LINKS **

Grandayy Links
YouTube:    / grandayy  
Twitter:   / grandayy  

Vsauce2 Links
Twitter:   / vsaucetwo  
Facebook:   / vsaucetwo  

Hosted, Produced, And Edited by Kevin Lieber
Instagram:   / kevlieber  
Twitter:   / kevinlieber  

Research And Writing by Matthew Tabor
  / matthewktabor  

Huge Thanks To Paula Lieber
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Craftality

Get Vsauce's favorite science and math toys delivered to your door!
https://www.curiositybox.com/

Select Music By Jake Chudnow:    / jakechudnow  

MY PODCAST THE CREATE UNKNOWN
   / thecreateunknown